基于英语远程教育的交际原则--兼谈英语网络课程的编写     

李予军 《北京城市学院学报》2004,(2):90-93

本文在简要阐述了交际法理论的主要内容、要求和实施手段后,结合建构主义理论思想探讨了在我国目前现有的英语远程教育中应如何贯彻交际法原则问题.文章还结合实际就英语网络课程的设计和编写及其作用提出了看法.  相似文献   

The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles     

Athikhun Suwannakhan  Daniel Casanova-Martínez  Laphatrada Yurasakpong  Punchalee Montriwat  Krai Meemon  Taweetham Limpanuparb 《Anatomical sciences education》2020,13(4):475-487

Forty anatomy articles were sampled from English Wikipedia and assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitatively, each article’s edit history was analyzed by Wikipedia X-tools, references and media were counted manually, and two readability indices were used to evaluate article readability. This analysis revealed that each article was updated 8.3 ± 6.8 times per month, and referenced with 33.5 ± 24.3 sources, such as journal articles and textbooks. Each article contained on average 14.0 ± 7.6 media items. The readability indices including: (1) Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level Readability Test and (2) Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula demonstrated that the articles had low readability and were more appropriate for college students and above. Qualitatively, the sampled articles were evaluated by experts using a modified DISCERN survey. According to the modified DISCERN, 13 articles (32.5%), 24 articles (60%), 3 articles (7.5%), were rated as “good,” “moderate,” and “poor,” respectively. There were positive correlations between the DISCERN score and the number of edits (r = 0.537), number of editors (r = 0.560), and article length (r = 0.536). Strengths reported by the panel included completeness and coverage in 11 articles (27.5%), anatomical details in 10 articles (25%), and clinical details in 5 articles (12.5%). The panel also noted areas which could be improved, such as providing missing information in 28 articles (70%), inaccuracies in 10 articles (25%), and lack or poor use of images in 17 articles (42.5%). In conclusion, this study revealed that many Wikipedia anatomy articles were difficult to read. Each article’s quality was dependent on edit frequency and article length. Learners and students should be cautious when using Wikipedia articles for anatomy education due to these limitations.  相似文献   

中国古代编辑出版的美学追求   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

李统兴 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2004,33(6):119-121

中国古代的编辑活动至少可以追溯到殷商时代。上下几千年,中国古代编辑出版的成就灿烂辉煌。编辑加工是中国古代编辑活动的核心内容,编辑加工的艺术水平体现了中国古代编辑出版艺术成就。这种艺术成就是编辑出版过程中编辑主体美学追求的结晶。中国古代编辑主体的美学追求首先是对主体自由本质的追求与确证,具体内容表现为求真、示美和达善。编辑主体的审美自觉是受众进入编辑主体的视野,并得到重视。  相似文献   

The publication fate of abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association conferences     

Rachel J. Hinrichs  Mirian Ramirez  Mahasin Ameen 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2021,109(4):590

Objective:We sought to determine how many abstracts presented at the 2012 and 2014 Medical Library Association (MLA) annual conferences were later published as full-text journal articles and which features of the abstract and first author influence the likelihood of future publication. To do so, we replicated a previous study on MLA conference abstracts presented in 2002 and 2003. The secondary objective was to compare the publication rates between the prior and current study.Methods:Presentations and posters delivered at the 2012 and 2014 MLA meetings were coded to identify factors associated with publication. Postconference publication of abstracts as journal articles was determined using a literature search and survey sent to first authors. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in the publication rate, and logistic regression was used to assess the influence of abstract factors on publication.Results:The combined publication rate for the 2012 and 2014 meetings was 21.8% (137/628 abstracts), which is a statistically significant decrease compared to the previously reported rate for 2002 and 2003 (27.6%, 122/442 abstracts). The odds that an abstract would later be published as a journal article increased if the abstract was multi-institutional or if it was research, specifically surveys or mixed methods research.Conclusions:The lower publication rate of MLA conference abstracts may be due to an increased number of program or nonresearch abstracts that were accepted or a more competitive peer review process for journals. MLA could increase the publication rate by encouraging and enabling multi-institutional research projects among its members.  相似文献   

在线印象管理视角：创新动机与创新绩效研究     

唐小飞  周磐  苏浩玄 《科研管理》2020,41(6):172-180

企业创新活动逐渐由封闭走向开放,互联网品牌创新社区成为企业创新的重要场所。本文基于社会心理学的视角,以在线印象管理为核心概念,对用户创新参与动机、印象构建行为及对创新绩效的影响进行了研究。实证发现：追求知识共创动机和追求网络社交动机的社区成员,采用获得性印象管理行为的可能性显著大于采用保护性印象管理行为;追求社群认同动机的社区成员,采用保护性印象管理行为的可能性显著大于采用获得性印象管理行为。品牌创新社区成员的社龄长短对采纳印象管理行为产生影响。获得性印象管理行为较保护性印象管理行为对品牌创新社区的创新绩效有更正面的影响。本研究拓展了品牌创新社区用户研究的理论视角,也为企业识别在线用户创新参与动机,从而制定合适的激励机制以提升创新绩效提供了建设性的启示。  相似文献   

基于虚拟仿真技术的线上项目式教学探索     

李祺  聂为之  房朝晖  袁博 《实验技术与管理》2022,(1):199-203

为解决实践教学环节中线上授课存在的师生互动不足、实验教学资源匮乏以及教师监督功能弱化等问题,设计并实施了项目式教学方案.该方案将项目式教学模式和虚拟仿真实验教学手段有机结合,从教学形式、实践教学平台、成绩评价指标体系3个方面进行革新.教学形式采用"项目式教学+翻转课堂"的方案;实践教学平台引入虚拟仿真控制系统实验资源,...  相似文献   

不同语种科技期刊稿件互荐刊登弊大于利——与董秀玥商榷     

潘伟 《编辑学报》2008,20(2):166-167

通过对国际生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求和中华医学会系列期刊稿约的解读,指出不同语种科技期刊稿件互荐刊登弊大于利,并与《编辑学报}2007年第6斯发表的《不同语种科技期刊稿件互荐刊登的意义及方法》一文的作者商榷。强调应按照国际惯例,允许作者以不同语种向不同期刊投稿,但不提倡、不鼓励、更不向其他期刊推荐发表论文。  相似文献   

通过计量指标分析发现操纵期刊评价结果的行为   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

马峥 《编辑学报》2016,28(6):608-611

科学计量指标可以客观反映期刊的质量和影响,是期刊评价和科研管理工作的重要工具,其科学性和有效性的前提是学术期刊坚守出版诚信,尊重知识的原始分布状态和传播过程.一些期刊采取人为调整指标的方式,企图操纵期刊的评价结果.这样的行为可以通过对科学计量指标的分析发现.本文通过对“引导作者增加不必要引用”、“互引”、“在影响因子时间窗口内外调节自引”等行为进行剖析发现:结合使用不同指标能更加客观科学地评估学术期刊的全面情况,操纵指标的行为很容易就被识破和曝光,因此学术期刊办刊人要坚守诚信底线,拒绝尝试弄虚作假.  相似文献   

网络学术期刊发展研究   总被引：10，自引：0，他引：10  

吕淑珍 《情报科学》2005,23(12):1827-1830

文章论述了网络学术期刊的发展现状,对期刊上网方式及优势进行了分析,针对目前网络学术期刊存在的问题,提出了今后的发展对策。  相似文献   

人文社科专著众筹OA出版发展现状和思考——以Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched为例     

徐志玮 《图书情报工作》2021,64(22):77-84

[目的/意义] 梳理人文社科专著众筹OA出版的发展现状，分析具有公益性特点的OA出版物和具有商业性特点的众筹出版所引起的冲突，以期对学术专著众筹出版提出有价值的思考。[方法/过程] 从发起者、投资者和众筹平台3个基本要素梳理Open Book Publishers和Knowledge Unlatched的众筹模式，比较异同点，探讨两者在竞争中引起的问题。[结果/结论] 目前，欧美国家的学术专著众筹出版分为高校、众筹商和OA出版社3种模式。Knowledge Unlatched是期望通过对图书馆的优质服务获得收益的众筹商，Open Book Publishers是借助网络开展众筹出版的OA出版社，两者属于商业化大型公司和非营利性OA出版社的竞争关系，在OA出版物的商业化开发、财务公开透明、垄断性的销售模式和审核制度方面值得高度关注。  相似文献